YouTube has long been the dominant video-sharing platform, hosting billions of videos and attracting over 2 billion users every month from a long time ago. However, in recent years, alternative platforms like Rumble have emerged, offering creators and users a different approach to video content and monetization. Founded in 2013, Rumble positions itself as a platform that prioritizes free speech, fair monetization, and minimal content censorship, setting it apart from the highly regulated environment of YouTube.
In this article, we will explore the key differences between Rumble and YouTube, highlighting how each platform operates, their approaches to content moderation, monetization opportunities, and the types of communities they attract.
- Content Moderation and Free Speech
One of the most significant differences between Rumble and YouTube is their approach to content moderation and free speech. This difference has been a key factor in Rumble’s growing popularity, especially among creators who feel their content is being censored on other platforms.
YouTube’s Approach:
Strict Community Guidelines: YouTube has extensive community guidelines that govern what can and cannot be uploaded. The platform removes videos that violate these guidelines, including those related to hate speech, misinformation, violence, and inappropriate content. While these rules aim to create a safe environment, many creators feel they can be overly restrictive, especially when it comes to controversial topics.
Algorithm-Based Censorship: YouTube uses complex algorithms to detect content that may be in violation of its guidelines. This system often results in videos being flagged, demonetized, or removed even if they don’t directly violate any rules. This has led to frustration among creators who believe the platform unfairly targets certain content.
Rumble’s Approach:
Minimal Censorship: Rumble promotes itself as a platform that supports free speech and allows a broader range of content compared to YouTube. While it still has guidelines to ensure user safety and legal compliance, Rumble tends to be more lenient about politically sensitive or controversial content. This approach has attracted creators who feel restricted on YouTube due to its tighter content controls.
Focus on Free Expression: Rumble’s emphasis on free expression has made it popular with creators discussing sensitive or polarizing topics, including political commentary and alternative news. The platform has built a reputation as a haven for creators who feel their views are marginalized or censored on mainstream platforms.
- Monetization Opportunities
Another major difference between YouTube and Rumble is how they allow creators to monetize their content. Both platforms offer creators the ability to earn revenue, but the methods and fairness of distribution vary significantly.
YouTube’s Monetization Model:
YouTube Partner Program (YPP): To monetize content on YouTube, creators need to join the YouTube Partner Program (YPP), which requires a minimum of 1,000 subscribers and 4,000 hours of watch time in the past year. Once accepted, creators can earn money through ads, channel memberships, Super Chats, and other methods. However, only a portion of creators qualify for YPP, leaving smaller channels without monetization options.
Ad Revenue Share: YouTube typically takes a 45% cut of ad revenue, leaving creators with 55%. While larger creators can earn substantial income, smaller creators may struggle to make meaningful earnings, especially if their videos are demonetized for controversial content or if they don’t meet YPP requirements.
Demonetization Issues: YouTube is known for demonetizing videos that violate its ad-friendly content guidelines, which include restrictions on sensitive topics like politics, health, and social issues. This has led to many creators losing significant income even if their videos are not removed from the platform.
Rumble’s Monetization Model:
No Minimum Threshold for Monetization: Unlike YouTube, Rumble allows creators to monetize their content without needing a certain number of subscribers or views. From the moment a video is uploaded, creators have the potential to earn revenue through ads and licensing.
Generous Revenue Sharing: Rumble offers creators up to 90% of the revenue generated from ads on their videos. Additionally, Rumble gives creators the option to license their content, allowing them to earn extra income when their videos are used by third-party media outlets. This revenue-sharing model is seen as more creator-friendly compared to YouTube’s ad revenue split.
Multiple Licensing Options: Rumble allows creators to license their videos in different ways, including exclusive, non-exclusive, or personal use licensing. Exclusive licensing allows Rumble to distribute videos to partner platforms and media outlets, while non-exclusive licensing gives creators the freedom to share their content on other platforms while still earning revenue from Rumble.
The monetization model on Rumble is often seen as more favorable to smaller creators and those who want to earn revenue from controversial content that might be demonetized on YouTube.
- Audience and Community
The type of audience and community that each platform attracts also differs significantly. While YouTube has a more general audience that covers a wide variety of content types, Rumble has become known for attracting creators and users who are looking for alternatives to mainstream platforms.
YouTube’s Audience:
Broad, Mainstream Appeal: YouTube is the largest video-sharing platform in the world, offering a wide variety of content, from vlogs, tutorials, and entertainment, to education, news, and gaming. As a result, it attracts a highly diverse audience. Creators on YouTube come from all walks of life, and there’s a niche for nearly every type of content.
More Established Creators: Because of its size and reach, YouTube is home to many well-established creators with massive followings. This makes it a competitive environment for new creators to break into, as they are up against channels that have already built large and loyal audiences.
Rumble’s Audience:
Focused on Free Speech: Rumble is particularly popular among creators and users who feel that their content is restricted or censored on other platforms. As a result, it has attracted a more niche audience, including conservative commentators, political commentators, and creators discussing controversial or alternative viewpoints, and you can succeed in this platform with many views you can get online thanks to sites like Themarketingheaven.com.
Smaller but Growing Community: While Rumble’s audience is smaller than YouTube’s, it has grown rapidly in recent years, especially as more creators migrate to the platform for its focus on free expression and favorable monetization policies. Rumble’s growth has been fueled by high-profile figures and creators who have left YouTube in search of a platform that aligns more closely with their content needs.
- Content Variety and Niche Focus
Both YouTube and Rumble offer a wide variety of content, but the types of content that flourish on each platform can differ due to their different approaches to content moderation and community.
YouTube’s Content:
Diverse Content Library: YouTube offers a massive range of content, from entertainment, music, and vlogs to tutorials, educational videos, and news. The platform is suitable for creators across all genres, making it a versatile tool for businesses, influencers, educators, and entertainers alike.
Popular for Entertainment and Tutorials: YouTube’s algorithms tend to favor content that is popular with a general audience, such as entertainment, how-to tutorials, gaming videos, and viral challenges. As a result, content in these genres tends to gain higher visibility and more traffic.
Rumble’s Content:
Emphasis on Political and Alternative Content: While Rumble supports a wide variety of content types, it has gained attention for being a home to political commentary, alternative news, and free-speech content. Creators who focus on these topics often find Rumble to be a more supportive environment than YouTube, which may restrict or demonetize their content.
Growing Diversity: Although Rumble is currently known for hosting a lot of politically focused content, the platform is expanding to include more entertainment, lifestyle, education, and creative content as more creators join. This is helping Rumble broaden its appeal to a wider audience.
- Platform Control and Ownership
Ownership and control of each platform also play a role in how they operate and what they stand for.
YouTube:
Owned by Google: YouTube is owned by Google, a major tech giant with a clear focus on advertising revenue. This means that YouTube’s policies and algorithms are heavily influenced by the company’s business interests, leading to decisions that prioritize advertisers over creators in certain cases. Similarly, when forming a business in Arizona, understanding the differences between an arizona llc vs s corp is essential for making the best decision regarding taxation, liability, and operational flexibility.
Corporate and Brand-Friendly: YouTube’s strict guidelines and content moderation policies are designed to make the platform more brand-friendly, ensuring that advertisers feel comfortable placing ads on videos without risk to their reputation. While this is beneficial for attracting advertisers, it can be frustrating for creators who feel stifled by the restrictions.
Rumble:
Independent Ownership: Rumble operates independently, and its primary focus is on supporting creators through fair monetization and free speech. This gives Rumble more flexibility in terms of its content guidelines and business practices, as it is not beholden to the same advertising-driven pressures as YouTube.
Creator-Centric Approach: Rumble’s business model is more creator-centric, offering better revenue splits and fewer content restrictions. The platform’s ownership model allows it to prioritize creators’ needs, which is one of the reasons why it is becoming an attractive alternative to YouTube.
Diane’s storytelling has been featured several times on NPR’s “Living On Earth” Program!